Is Black Money Act at odds with Article 20 of the Constitution?
- Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (Black Money Act) came into force on 1st April, 2016, with an aim to tax undisclosed foreign income and foreign asset acquired from such undisclosed foreign income and to punish the person indulging in illegitimate means of generating money and causing loss to the revenue.
- Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India provides that no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and Ors. vs. The State of Vindhya Pradesh reported in AIR 1953 SC 394 has held that ex post facto laws which retrospectively create offences and punish them are bad being highly inequitable and unjust.
- Section 72(c) of the Black Money Act undisclosed foreign assets are liable to be taxed in the year when it comes to the notice of the Assessing Officer
- Thus, what Sec 72(c) essentially says is that irrespective of the year of purchase of a foreign asset, it would be taxed when it comes to the notice of the AO. For eg: If Mr X has purchased a villa in a Spanish Island in 2001 but it has come to the notice of the AO in 2021-22, it would be taxed in 2021-22 even though the Black Money Act came into force in 2016.
- The constitutional validity of the retrospective application of Sec 72(c) and as a consequence, taxation of assets purchased before the Act came into force, could thus be challenged in the courts.
Team – Intellex Strategic Consulting Pvt Ltd
Economiclawpractice.com, Intellexconsulting.com, Venturestreets.com, BuySellMergers.com